Friday, 25 July 2014

Maleficent- *spoilers*


DISCLAIMER: This blog is not for profit. All images and footage used are property of their respective companies unless stated otherwise. I do not claim ownership of this material.

From it's announcement in May 2011, this film had the potential to be absolutely astounding. The premise of telling a classic story from the perspective of it's iconic villain, in this case Maleficent from Sleeping Beauty, seemed to be full-proof, having been done so fantastically well with long running Broadway show Wicked, as well as the fact that it had some truly great actors gracing the screen  and a basic plot all of it's own which had the potential for some fantastic and complex Drama, if it was developed properly. However, when it was finally released, it was generally met with mixed reviews, even being ranked 'rotten' on review website Rotten Tomatoes. But was this really fair?

Generally, it is hard to decide whether this is a bad movie with some good elements, or a good movie that simply has several negative aspects dragging it down. Many elements of the story are done very well, including the heart-warming relationship between the titular character and Princess Aurora. This is also supported by incredible performances from both Angelina Jolie and Elle Fanning and on the whole the movie benefits from epic scenes such as Maleficent flying which are filmed spectacularly and with many well chosen shots, making the movie as a whole very enjoyable to watch. The computer animated backgrounds of the Moors where Maleficent dwells are also stunning- to be honest, the film is worth watching just for these elements alone.      

Another part of the film that may cause controversy amongst audience members is the presentation of the three fairies, who have been transformed, from strong independent women who, along with some incredible artwork, essentially made the original film the masterpiece that it was, to pathetic and ditzy morons who cannot even look after a baby for themselves. Whilst this may anger some viewers, it actually makes sense within the context of this story, as it is being told from Maleficent's point of view and this is the way in which she would have seen them.                        

However, the movie does have some glaring flaws. Whilst the story had the potential to be a fascinating character study of arguably Disney's greatest villain, it is instead frustratingly simplistic, with only one real motivation for Maleficent, which is not helped by the fact that her transition into a villain is so instantaneous that it has very little motivation and as a result little to no impact- she is just suddenly evil, after one event, which means that it is not as emotionally effective as the similar storyline of, for example, Wicked. There are also certain plot elements that come in towards the end of the film that seem to have been brought in without any prior thought and as a result, they seem completely ridiculous. A great example of this is the resolution to the film's climax, which seems to come out of nowhere just to get the protagonist out of a situation which would otherwise have been impossible to escape.

In conclusion, although Maleficent has it's problems, overall the more positive elements allow it to be at the very least entertaining, although not a masterpiece and with an almost ludicrous conclusion.
     


Wednesday, 2 July 2014

The Fault in Our Stars

DISCLAIMER: This blog is not for profit. All images and footage used are property of their respective companies unless stated otherwise. I do not claim ownership of this material.


It is probably accurate to say that the biggest factor behind this film being so outstanding is the strength of the source material, John Green's brilliant book. It is even more accurate to say that, as a massive fan of the book, a part of the film's success lies in the joy of seeing the beloved characters brought to life and seeing the story that had previously only been seen of paper, shown on screen for the first time- however, this is not the only component in the movie's high quality.

For anyone who hasn't read the book or even heard of The Fault in Our Stars, it focusses on two cancer-struck teenagers who fall in love after meeting at a support group. It can be said that a lot of the elements that allowed the book to resonate with fans are carried over into the film, allowing both to be exceptional, from the sarcastic attitude of the narrator, which makes it seem very fresh as well as being honest and not condescending towards it's audience to the refreshing and at times biting realism and incredibly likeable characters, all of which is held together by an ultimately beautiful love story.

On the other hand, it can also be said that the film has merits as it's own piece, not least the brilliant acting from the entire cast, but especially Shailene Woodley and Ansel Elgort as the star crossed leads. In addition to this, the brutally emotional climax is made all the more tear-jerking on screen by the sheer fact that it is being shown instead of written.

Both of these make the movie just as good if not better than the book, but that is not to say that the film does not have it's flaws- the love story can be a bit cheesy at times and at certain points the character of Augustus Waters can become more like a fantasy that a real and well developed character, due to his characters habit of being almost a bit too perfect all the time for the majority of the story. However, just at the point where audience members may start to feel this way, both the movie and the book blow these factors completely out of the water deliver a ruthlessly realistic ending to an overall brilliant film that will make even the most hard hearted of viewers sob.